Sib wrote:
Studies are showing that (in the US) upwards of 55% of the population have environmental (as opposed to food) allergies. That is aggregate and not smoke specific, but most people with allergies develop more and more over time and smoke is one of the more common allergies. I have seen studies that indicate levels as high as 85% in cities, especially those with high levels of pollution, such as NY, LA and London. I have not verified the numbers or vetted the studies, so I do not claim those stats.
Ok, but this doesn't get us anywhere nearer to a reliable estimation of the health risks to others when a smoker lights up a fag in public. What's the chances that a random smoker smoking in a busy public place is going to cause a serious problem for someone else? Is it significant enough for him to have to modify his behaviour? (If it is, then ban smoking, like I said)
You mentioned asthmatics. As you probably know, approximately 20% of asthmatics in western countries are smokers themselves, so while it is true that cigarette smoke is a universal trigger, cigarette smoke only has the
potential to trigger an attack, otherwise asthmatics who smoke would be on the floor having an attack as soon as they light up. So I'm still left asking how likely is it that someone smoking in public is going to cause someone else a serious problem?
Sib wrote:
I find it interesting that someone can have the idea that someone with asthma, allergies or who just does not like the smell should just shut up, deal with it, tough titties, but that the same should not be applied to them the other way around... that no one should be able to tell them that they should just deal with it and go somewhere appropriate to smoke.
Well for me it's all about the likelihood of a smoker running across someone with asthma or allergies so serious that they are very likely going to have an attack due to one breath of that smoker's cigarette smoke. If it's highly likely then it's fair to inconvenience the smoker. If it isn't, then the smoker is being inconvenienced on the very slim off chance of causing someone else a problem - which doesn't seem reasonable to me.
(But then again, I'm in favour of the public being financially inconvenienced by having their tax money go to providing access ramps on the off chance that the few disabled people in the community might use them, so I'm probably not being consistent there. Hmm, I need to think about that.)
Sib wrote:
How come 'tough luck' and 'deal with it' are only on the majority of people being inconvenienced by one individual instead of on the one individual causing the problem?
Are the majority really being inconvenienced, and what is the nature of their complaint? "I dislike the smell" isn't something I take all that seriously since if you're around it enough you get used to it. The health risk is another matter but I'm still wondering how significant the risk is.
Sib wrote:
For me, it is not about smokers, really... it is about people doing things that they know are most likely negatively effecting (be it health or just annoyance) the majority of people around them, but saying 'tough luck... I will do what I want to do, fuck everyone else.
I agree that there are people like that with a sense of entitlement to do as they damn well please, but then there are others who might come across as being the exact same way but the reason for it is they feel that what they are doing is no worse than the things they dislike but have to tolerate.
In a small village where there is a strong sense of community and healthy channels of communication, then people are going to be more aware of how their behaviour annoys others and will modify that behaviour, since they know any issues they have about other people's behaviour will be dealt with; reciprocity.
In large towns and cities, we're going to keep running into strangers, and the only viable form of reciprocity is to show mutual toleration for one another's annoying behaviour (within reason) which is helped by understanding why the other person is behaving that way. For instance, that boy with the annoying game - if I had heard he was on a high level then I could suck up the annoying sound because I can appreciate what it would mean to turn the game off and lose all that work. Same with smokers, I can appreciate what it is like to want a smoke when you're on your way somewhere, so I get over how unpleasant I find the smell of their smoke when they walk past me.
But behaviour that doesn't just annoy but causes health issues.... that's a different matter, and I'm up in the air on that at the moment.